County proposes offsetting changes to two emergency-facility contracts

Both forms describe the revisions as contingency reallocations; figures are contract sums.

Schedule and next decision

Each form lists a zero-day change in contract time. That describes the proposed change orders' schedule effect; it does not establish when either facility will be completed. The forms state that an architect, contractor and owner must sign for a change order to be valid.

Commissioners Court's Nov. 3 agenda places approval of both Change Order No. 4 forms under consent item 5E and separately lists a discussion of the projects' timeline and ARPA funding under item 4A. Readers can inspect the posted agenda for the proposed action; the court's later minutes and executed forms are the next records that can establish what happened.